Nectid

Build the
Evidence That
Moves the Deal.

Nectid helps clinical-stage biotech companies determine what evidence
will cause a specific counterparty to fund, option, license, or advance
an asset—and then aligns business development, development strategy,
and capital around that decision.

Powered by TSCIP

Development designed backward from the transaction.

Science identifies the opportunity.

Evidence defines what’s underwritable. Validation defines market need. Capital defines who funds the proof.

SCIENCE

Evidence

Capital

Transaction

The Problem

Good Science Does

Not Automatically Create a Transaction.

01

The biology is compelling.

02

Early clinical data are encouraging.

03

Pharma expresses interest.

04

But the transaction does not happen.

The Decision-Evidence Gap

A potential partner may require evidence the current program was never designed to produce.

The gap is rarely about whether the science is good. It is about whether a specific decision-maker can underwrite the remaining uncertainty.

E01

Monotherapy activity

E02

Combination attribution

E03

Additional safety exposure

E04

Evidence in another tumor state

E05

Defined regulatory path

E06

CMC readiness

E07

Specific proof points

Generating everything is expensive.

Generating the right evidence can change the asset.

TSCIP

Development Designed Backward From the Transaction.

TSCIP is Nectid's proprietary BD-led development platform. It starts from the decision a counterparty has to make and works backward into the development plan.

Traditional Development

TSCIP

“What study should we run next?”

What is the smallest credible evidence package that would change the next important Capital or partnering decision?

Evaluation Framework

What TSCIP Evaluates

01

Mechanistic rationale

02

Tumor-state biology

03

Independent drug activity

04

Combination attribution

05

Therapeutic index

06

Transferability across therapeutic backbones

07

Competitive positioning

08

Partner substitution risk

09

Clinical differentiation

10

Regulatory strategy

11

Development timing

12

CMC readiness

13

Pharma strategic fit

14

Evidence required for partner re-engagement

15

Development-capital requirements

16

Potential sources of external capital

One Operating System

The TSCIP Operating Model

Science. Field Validation. Evidence. Capital. Transaction.

01

01

02

03

04

05

06

Asset Assessment

Strengths, critical uncertainties, partnerability, evidence gaps and capital requirements.

Counterparty Mapping

Which specific companies could act, and on which dimension of strategic fit.

Field BD Validation

Direct engagement to learn what would actually change the counterparty's decision.

Evidence Architecture

The minimum credible evidence package required to cross the identified gate.

Capital Routing

Who should finance that evidence, and through which structure.

Transaction Execution

Carrying the validated thesis into a defined strategic transaction.

Field BD Validation

BD Is Not the Final Step. It Is Part of Development.

Counterparty feedback is treated as development data. It defines the evidence gap, which defines the plan, which defines the capital required.

The Feedback Loop

Structure

Two Funnels. One Objective.

Funnel 01

Strategic Partnering

Identify companies for which the asset creates strategic value.

Funnel 02

Evidence Financing

Identify who should finance the evidence required to unlock the transaction.

Decision Output

Advance. Modify. Hold. Defer.

Every engagement resolves to a stated recommendation, with the reasoning made explicit.

Advance

Evidence and market validation justify continued investment.

Advance

Evidence and market validation justify continued investment.

Advance

Evidence and market validation justify continued investment.

Advance

Evidence and market validation justify continued investment.

Capital discipline, not development for its own sake.

Who We Work With

Three Positions. One Framework.

Asset Holders

Turn Partner Interest Into an Actionable Development Strategy.

Convert informal pharma interest into a defined evidence requirement, a costed development plan and a funding route.

Pharma Partners

Find Assets Through the Evidence That Matters.

Evaluate opportunities against the proof points your committees actually underwrite, with the gaps stated openly.

Development-Capital Partners

Finance an Identified Evidence Gap.

Deploy capital against a specific, validated evidence requirement with a defined transaction pathway on the other side.

Track Record

Built From Transaction Experience.

Tapentadol + Pregabalin

Therapeutic combination IP · Transaction to
Grünenthal

A Nectid-originated therapeutic combination concept was developed into a defined intellectual property position, supported by a development rationale framed around the requirements of a strategic counterparty already active in the therapeutic area.

The programme was subsequently transacted to Grünenthal. The work illustrates the sequence Nectid applies: identify the therapeutic opportunity, create a defensible position, define the evidence a specific counterparty would need, and run the process to a decision.

01

Therapeutic Opportunity

02

IP Creation

03

Development Strategy

04

Strategic Counterparty

05

Transaction

Built for Sensitive Business Development.

Engagements routinely involve confidential company information, unpublished data and direct counterparty feedback. Materials are handled on a need-to-know basis, access is limited to the individuals working on the engagement, and counterparty conversations are conducted under agreed confidentiality terms.

Have an Asset Caught
Between Clinical Promise and a Transaction?

That is precisely where TSCIP is designed to operate.

© 2026 Nectid. All rights reserved.

Please do not submit confidential or proprietary information through the initial contact form.

Scroll to Top